‘Mad Max: Fury Road’ review – say hello to the new king of the road

mad-max-fury-road-main poster

The problem with most action movies is there’s an imaginary line that most filmmakers won’t dare cross as they’re too worried — in some cases rightfully so — that the audience won’t buy the movie if it goes beyond that mark.

mad-max-fury-road-charlize theron vs tom hardyWith his latest, ‘Mad Max: Fury Road,’ George Miller considers the line then proceeds to laugh, shoot it, drop a few grenades and missiles at it before unleashing a flamethrowing guitarist to make sure the line is obliterated. Miller’s message is clear: if you need an action film with some deep, intricate plot to make the crazy death-defying sequences work for you, ‘Fury Road’ is definitely not your kind movie. But if you’re up for the ride you’ll be rewarded with the most senses- and (common) sense-shattering action spectacle in decades.

There’s nothing too insane or completely outrageous for Miller, but 30 minutes in, your last bit of resistance and trying to make sense out of certain plot points and why you can’t make out all the dialogue will have faded and you’ll be grinning or outright laughing at the onscreen carnage.

Miller likely didn’t have a lot of sleepless nights coming up with the plot. Max (Tom Hardy) reluctantly aids Imperator Furiosa (Charlize Theron) as she tries to smuggle the wives/breeders (including Rosie Huntington-Whiteley and Zoe Kravtitz) from the clutches of the twisted Immortan Joe (Hugh Keays-Byrne) and get them safely to her hometown. Along the way, they pick up Nux (Nicholas Hoult), one of Joe’s followers who starts doubting his leader’s vision after encountering the wives. Joe will stop at nothing to get them back setting up a crazed action-packed chase through the desert wastelands.

mad-max-fury-road-nathan jones and nicholas houltPost apocalyptic takes on the world are borderline cliche now, but Miller makes his take wholly original and does it old school by keeping CGI to a minimum. Technology makes film making easier, but Miller’s throwback approach is so refreshing to show epic blockbusters can be just as massive and stunning on the big screen without the benefit of computer assistance.

Despite the carnage, Miller keeps the action easy to follow regardless of how many actors are flying around on screen. ‘Fury Road’ is part action film, part circus, part most bizarre rock concert ever. There’s never an explanation as to why Joe needs a bass guitarist swinging in front of a massive speaker wall while drummers bang on the other side of their ride, but it works. The same could be true for everything other aspect of the film.

Although there’s a lot of action, Miller never lets the violence get too gratuitous instead leaving characters’ fates to the audiences’ imagination. There are so many directors who could take this film and make a goofy, guilty pleasure, but Miller displays impeccable control of all facets to create a modern day pure action masterpiece.  mad-max-fury-road- tom hardy as mad max

Cinematographer John Seale paints a beautiful and visual stunning end of the world backdrop. The film lacks the expected bleak, washed out look of the genre and the use of vibrant colors further makes it stand out. Jenny Beavan’s costume designs are extraordinary giving the characters a very distinct and at times terrifying look.

Hardy has the presence to be a more self aware and snarky modern take on the character Mel Gibson made famous, but he dials it down considerably. Max isn’t a leader or even a hero. He’s a survivor. Were Hardy to tap into more of his charisma, it would have clashed with what makes the character work even in an era where all our heroes need to toss out some wisecracks and treat everything like a joke.

Tom Hardy as Mad MaxThe biggest trick of the movie though is how effectively Miller and co-screenwriters Brendan McCarthy and Nick Lathouris weave Max in to Furiosa’s action movie. Sure the title would give the impression this is all about Max’s latest adventure, but while he may get title billing, but he’s playing the Kobe Bryant to Furiosa’s Shaq — a vital contributor, but this mission would have gone on with or without Max’s involvement. It’s a brilliant strategy and it works perfectly thanks to Hardy and Theron getting they’re not competing for the big line or showcase scene.

Furiosa quickly earns her spot on the list of tail-kicking females like Ripley and Sarah Conner by virtue of not being some highly trained warrior like Black Widow or ‘Kill Bill’s’ The Bride, but just for being a strong character who just so happens to be a woman. She’s every bit Max’s equal, but unlike so many well-meaning yet forced modern stories, Furiosa handles her business without emasculating Max, and she doesn’t have to validate herself to anyone so the audience never looks at her as less than Max and that’s with a prosthetic left arm.

mad-max-fury-road-tom-hardy-charlize-theronA film in 2015 that stick to the standard action formula of a flawed lead character full of angst helping some woman fight back against her tormentors would likely be fun and a big hit, but by going against the norm and embracing every bit of chaos in this mad world, Miller creates a new king of the road that’s going to be hard for any upcoming blockbuster in 2015 and beyond to top.

Rating: 10 out of 10

22 thoughts on “‘Mad Max: Fury Road’ review – say hello to the new king of the road”

  1. Pierre Mooney Cinema Convo Special Features The Reviews About Box-office roundup – March 16, 2014 – “Mr. Peabody” parks “Need for Speed” Posted by jklmd2002 on March 16, 2014 Posted in: Box office roundup. Tagged: Liam Neeson, Mr. Peabody & says:

    I am totally happy with a new MAD MAX film a long with a a new STAR WARS film. Both of these genres are among my near the top of favorites as you know. I think it is sheer fantasy of the possibility that MAD MAX films stir in us. The films mix old technology and the future so completely. They remind us the urge to survive leads great inventiveness in the use of that technology. So it keeps the basic idea of brutal force leads to bloody confrontation. Seeing the trailer I was struck by the music which as usual makes the carnage even more frightening. The over the top appearance and acting of the characters both good and bad seems to grab a hold of one senses and we just try to hold to our rationality. We think “no people will not act like that”, while remembering recent several incidents ethnic cleansing, genocide and mob disorder in our modern world. I think it is good that the Director always throws a little humor to lighten up the terror and chaos.

    1. Pierre it was completely satisfying. There’s a great amount of humor that doesn’t feel forced. I’m looking forward to seeing what you think about it when you see it!

  2. im on the fence. i see this all the time in anime.. but i like the actors. I also hate this right wing hate group complaining about charlize being too much of a leader. I mean good lord… I PC folks can go over board but these hate groups are delusional

    1. I don’t know why you hit those boards man. They’re stuck in the old mindset. Furiosa is no different than characters like Scarlett, Lady Jaye, She-Ra, Cheetarah for cats of our generation.

  3. I watched this film with real interest and enthusiasm. However, the ending seemed to be really underwhelming. Max helps install the good girl in the seat of power and she unleashes free water for everyone? I was hoping for a plot twist of some kind–e.g., the villain was actually right in denying people water because there is so little of it left; and now that the last remaining water in storage has been spilled, the last few patches of grass in the desert will die out.

    Did I miss something at the end or what? It wasn’t as optimistic as unlimited free water for everyone, was it?

      1. I loved the rest of it! It was so refreshing to see what looked like actual death-defying stunts stunts performed on camera rather than CGI fakery. It kind of hearkens back to The General (1927) for me a bit, with circus-like stunts coming at you at a mile a minute and each stunt looking more dangerous than the last. My mouth was on the floor throughout the picture and it was a thoroughly enjoyable experience!

  4. Well, J.C. I guess you do not have much faith in the ability of humans to innovate and conserve without a DICTATOR to make them do it. I believe the new relatively free society where the good people like the girl who have the best interests of the entire society brought into power by Max in the end of the movie will do OK. I do not think we can assume that the girl feels unlimited free water is in the best interests of society. I think that lest scene was simply a celebration of freedom from oppression

    1. I was looking for the message that no dictator is good, no matter what their initial intentions. The reality of things is that no one can do right by everyone, and sometimes evil is a matter of perspective. I was sort of looking for the idea that despite how evil the dictator was portrayed, he still did some things right and there was method to his seeming madness. I was sort of hoping to see the “good” side now struggle with the same decisions he must have had to make and perhaps either come back to the same ways or potentially make things even worse by being too generous. It’s kind of difficult to imagine a lasting happy ending after we are shown a reality so desperate and bleak.

      1. I agree no we may can do right by everyone. We can just try to the best for everyone. But evil is evil. No matter how you look at it.

Alright, so what do you think?